Berkeley Daily Planet
Weekend, July 20-21, 2002
Page 4
FORUM
Family values best learned from family
To the Editor:
A recently drafted ordinance regulating the hours during which Community
Cable TV can air so-called indecent material is coming before the City
Council for a first reading on July 23. This unconstitutional legislation
should be defeated in accordance with Councilmember Spring's recommendation.
I understand and sympathize with the goal of making sure our youth are
exposed to positive values, but as a licensed Marriage Family Therapist,
I am convinced that this is done most effectively through honest and clear
communication within the family, not through misguided government intervention.
The resources which would be required to administer the proposed ordinance
would much better be spent on social programs to address the many unmet
needs of families in distress in our community.
While some may find the material on certain shows currently airing after
10 p.m. to be unsavory, our biggest responsibility if we value free speech
is to defend freedom of expression even of views we personally disagree
with. Indeed, this is when we must be especially vigilant to ensure that
our personal reactions do not get in the way of the reasonable exercise
of our fellow citizens' first amendment rights.
Noted civil liberties attorney Jim Chanin has pointed out serious constitutional
problems with the proposed ordinance, and he has made it clear that if
the City of Berkeley passes such legislation it will be challenged in
the courts, leading to costly litigation. In these times of fiscal constraints
on the City budget, it is more imperative than ever that we use our resources
wisely.
Berkeley councilmembers should spare the City from unnecessary and costly
litigation and from the embarrassment of legislating some of the most
conservative standards in the nation at a time when all our civil liberties
are under attack due to the actions of right-wing Attorney General John
Ashcroft. They should stand in Berkeley's proud tradition of free speech
and vote No on the proposed ordinance.
Nancy Carleton
Berkeley
Back to Censorship Home
Back
to FMUP home |