Here is the item on the Agenda
at the BCC meeting:
26. Scheduling of Adult
and Sexually Explicit Programming on Public Access Television
From: Councilmembers Armstrong, Hawley and Olds
Recommendation: Direct the City Attorney to develop an ordinance
that regulates the hours during which Berkeleys local public access
television station may schedule programming self-described as for
adult viewing and/or sexually explicit.
Contact: Polly Armstrong, District 8, 981-7180, Mim Hawley, District
5, 981-7150, Betty Olds, District 6, 981-7160
5.14.02
Frank's speech for Berkeley City Council meeting.
Hi, I am Frank Moore. I'm a
producer on BTV. I do my own show, UNLIMITED POSSIBILITIES, as well as
"sponsor" a show by Mbanna Kantako (well-known as the father
of the microradio movement) and the popular show by the sex therapist/educator/personality
Dr. Susan Block. All three shows are politically/socially radical, aiming
to change society.
Yesterday THE BERKELEY DAILY PLANET called me to get my reaction to the
city councils considering rules for b-tvs so-called adult
programs. It was news to me! And then the questions started coming into
my head. Why is the city council making rules for b-tv, a public access
station which is charged with promoting free speech? Isnt that the
duty of bcms board and staff?
We have had a few months of very public debate after the bcm board made
what it now admits was a mistake by trying to move some programs which
a few people complained about to the time ghetto of 2am-6am from 10pm-6am
in lieu of censorship. The courts have made it very clear that censorship
is illegal on public access stations. The board corrected itself at the
following meeting, which was packed with people who believe in free speech.
But now we are considering the same mistake again. Why? Why does Berkeley
need more limiting rules than the standard 10pm safe harbor rule? Why
give up the channel of free speech and of free expression for all of the
community just because some are offended by this or that show? Free speech
is our right which is our duty to protect.
Now we btv producers ask to be shown after 10pm. We do so not necessarily
because of the content, but because of the freedom it gives us. But if
you limit shows by their possible content, thats censorship. Thats
illegal. But it is also unworkable. Who will define what is "sexually
explicit," "objectionable," and other vague terms? Hey,
Kriss Worthington will be on my show. Some people will think that is objectionable.
But that is the price of free speech.
Please respect free speech!
Monday, May 13, 2002
Back to Censorship home
Back to FMUP home
|